Membership dues are paid annually.
Organizations make a big deal of that annual renewal,
sending multiple reminder notices as if that membership were a subscription to
Time Magazine.
|
In our experience as consultants
over the past 15 years, it is the rare organization where any more than a
handful of members provide additional donations throughout the year above and
beyond their membership dues. |
Memberships tend to be inexpensive.
An
individual membership at Tucsons world-renowned Arizona Sonora Desert
Museum is $40. Lest you think that low price is just in my sleepy hometown,
membership at New York Citys Metropolitan Museum of Art is as low as $95
for local residents.
|
Not only is this money that only
comes in once a year, its giving levels barely graze the bottom rung of a
typical annual appeal. |
Almost by definition, membership is transactional.
Members
provide financial support in exchange for a tangible set of benefits - free
admission, a monthly arts calendar, discounts on classes, a Pavarotti DVD
set.
|
While members certainly feel
supportive of the cause, members can also be heard saying, Im
considering not renewing my membership this year. I rarely use it...
Their thoughts about their membership are not first and foremost as a donor who
is supporting a cause, but as the user of a product or service. The
transactional nature of the relationship is further reinforced by ongoing
payment-due renewal notices, that are worded to focus on what members will no
longer receive if they allow that membership to lapse. |
Transactions require more work for the
organization than straight donations.
Organizations who rely on membership spend a great deal
of time, effort, cash and emotional focus on ensuring their members receive
value above and beyond just the obvious value of supporting the mission (the
thing you wanted to raise money for in the first place).
|
In addition to standard fundraising
costs, membership entails expenses for all the stuff the member
receives. |
Net
proceeds are all that count.
Add up
the costs of all your membership perks - the magazine, the postage, the mugs,
the free events, the lost admissions revenues - and it is clear your
organization is netting less than $40 from its $40 membership
donation.
|
Once you factor in the cost beyond
the actual member perks - the staff time to secure and manage those items, as
well as the ongoing renewal notices - might more money be raised if
the staff were doing something other than ordering mugs or creating
member events? |
As we
summarize the revenue side of the membership equation, we see the
following:
Membership is once-a-year, low-dollar revenue from
purchasers who, while supportive of the cause, expect to receive
stuff in exchange for their donation. Membership is transactional
rather than engaging, and those transactions require more staff time than other
donation programs.
In
addition to these financial cautions, there is one additional caution that
relates not to revenues, but to the very mission of the
organization.
Membership is defined by exclusivity. Either one is a
member or not.
An
individual membership at Tucsons world-renowned Arizona Sonora Desert
Museum is $40. Lest you think that low price is just in my sleepy hometown,
membership at New York Citys Metropolitan Museum of Art is as low as $95
for local residents.
|
Effecting community change requires
a culture of INclusivity. It requires as many hands on deck as possible. It
requires that an organization provide service to anyone who needs it,
regardless of (and often specifically in contrast to) their ability to pay for
that service.
How does it impact a museums
mission to provide education and foster appreciation in the
community if they provide discounts only to those who can afford
membership? Does the mission de facto become to provide education and
foster appreciation only among those who can afford it?
The same question holds true for a
Nonprofit Resource Center whose for-pay workshops are open to anyone, while
free workshops are offered only as a perk for its members. Does that Nonprofit
Resource Centers mission de facto become to serve our
members, rather than to serve the community?
|
When we ask, What are the pros
and cons of a membership campaign? we are considering one approach in a
vacuum. And while the pros may outweigh the cons, that still doesnt make
it the BEST choice among a realm of options.
So whats the answer? The
answer requires that we consider the range of options for raising money to
support your cause, and choose your fundraising strategy by weighing those
tactics against objective criteria. Include membership in the mix,
as well as all the other fundraising tactics that are common in your field.
Then ask:
- How much might each approach
raise?
- How much work will it take?
- Will those donors become real
friends?
- Etc.
Add up and compare your answers and
see which comes out on top.
You may be surprised that membership
as a fundraising tool can be beat in every aspect by other more effective means
of raising funds.
If you are inclined to say,
Yes, but membership is more of a FRIENDraiser, perhaps it is time
to get serous about real FriendRaising.
Click
|
|